Health, Healthcare, and Government Spending (and a Culture of Health)

November 29, 2016 / Michael D. Miller MD / Access to Healthcare, Delivery of Healthcare, Economics & Financing, Federal Healthcare Reform, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Health System Reform, Information & Communications, Innovation, Medicaid, Medicare, Politics, Private-Employer Based Health Insurance, Public Health, State-Level Healthcare Reform / 1 Comment

Why governments care about health spending and healthcare, how they are connected to overall government spending and priorities, and why addressing social determinants of health is so important for making lasting improvements, were the subjects I covered in a presentation at George Mason’s graduate policy school in September. My goal was to provide the soon-to-be policy analysts and advisers with a framework for understanding those issues so they will be able to provide useful recommendations to their future decision making bosses. (See the slide below for the topics covered in the presentation.) Links to videos of the talk are below, along with short descriptions – I think that Part 6 is particularly good.…

Specialty Drugs: Getting What We Asked For

January 7, 2015 / Michael D. Miller MD / Access to Healthcare, Delivery of Healthcare, Economics & Financing, Innovation, Politics, Therapeutic Substitution & Interchange / 1 Comment

The cost of so-called specialty drugs has become a major health policy issue largely because of spending projections for new medicines for chronic hepatitis C infection and cancers. Having worked on issues related to the development, approval, availability, use, and cost of medical treatments for more than 25 years, I’ve noted with concern and bemusement how cost and value issues are being discussed and presented in public debates and policy circles.

The Intense Debate About New Biopharmaceuticals Was Predictable

The introduction of significant new specialty medicines is reasonably predictable because information about biomedical research and the developmental status of new drugs and biologics is publically available from the FDA and company press releases.…

Sovaldi® and Curing Hep C – Myths and Other Facts

June 16, 2014 / Michael D. Miller MD / Access to Healthcare, Delivery of Healthcare, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Innovation, Medicaid, VA/DoD / 7 Comments

The introduction of new oral medicines that can cure chronic hepatitis C infections (including Sovaldi®) have led to some intense discussions permeated with misleading information about the pricing of new medicines, how such medicines are “game changers,” and the implications for budget-crunched payers. Below I summarize some key points about those issues.

1. Myth #1: How Medicines are Priced

One of the perpetuating myths about biopharmaceuticals is that medicines are priced to recoup research and development costs.¹ It’s a myth. As I’ve written about elsewhere prescription medicine prices are set like everything else in a regulated free market: Companies set prices to maximize revenues and profits based upon the market opportunities and the value the new medicine provide compared to the consequences of the disease and other treatment options – including no treatment at all. …

CER, HIT, and Women’s Health Research

June 19, 2013 / Michael D. Miller MD / Access to Healthcare, Comparative Effectiveness, Delivery of Healthcare, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Information & Communications, Innovation, Public Health, Quality of Care & Safety / 5 Comments

Below is a video of my discussion with Phyllis Greenberger, President and CEO of the Society for Women’s Health Research, about the implications of comparative effectiveness research (CER) and information technology for women’s health and quality improvement.

What are your thoughts about CER and HIT? Will they lead to higher quality, lower cost, or more efficient/better healthcare? And if so, how soon?

FYI – The SWHR’s July 18-19 meeting mentioned in the video is “What a Difference an X Makes: The State of Women’s Health Research.”…

Jimmy Buffett Medicare and Healthcare

January 30, 2013 / Michael D. Miller MD / Economics & Financing, Federal Healthcare Reform, Health System Reform, Innovation, Medicare, Private-Employer Based Health Insurance / No Comments

The title of Jimmy Buffett’s song “Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes” is a good description of the fundamental changes occurring in the US healthcare system: Within the Federal Government – and Medicare in particular – widespread “Changes in Latitudes, Changes in Attitudes” are evident in the implementation of the Affordable Care and HITECH Acts, and the overall leadership of the Department of Health and Human Services. Healthcare leaders in private organizations – and state and local governments – are embracing these changes, which collectively are leading to better healthcare quality and lower costs…. Or at least slower increases in healthcare costs, a.k.a.…

Accomplishments v. Activity in Healthcare

January 9, 2013 / Michael D. Miller MD / Access to Healthcare, Delivery of Healthcare, Health System Reform, Information & Communications, Innovation, Public Health / No Comments

The phrase “Paying for Value not Volume” has been health reform’s mantra for several/many years. But the concepts embodied in “Paying for Value not Volume” are problematic on two levels. First, the term “Value not Volume” doesn’t convey a clear picture of the specific changes health reform is trying to achieve. This creates problems communicating the benefits of health reform and healthcare transformation to people who are not steeped in health policy, including most clinicians and patients.

And second, the “Paying for” part of the phrase indicates that the focus is on financial reforms. This creates a barrier to people (i.e.,…

Cutting Employer Healthcare Costs

November 26, 2012 / Michael D. Miller MD / Clinician-Patient Relationships, Delivery of Healthcare, Economics & Financing, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Private-Employer Based Health Insurance, Public Health, Quality of Care & Safety / 1 Comment

Over the past 20+ years larger companies have tried many tactics to control the growth of their healthcare spending, including HMOs, consumer-directed healthcare, wellness programs, value-based insurance design, selective contracting for high-cost procedures, personal health assessments, etc. While some of those efforts temporarily reduced employers’ healthcare spending, they did not change the long-term trends, in part because they only targeted employees and did not focus on high or very high cost individuals – many of whom are not active workers. [A recent Health Affairs article analyzing conditions associated with employee healthcare spending reflects this “searching under the streetlamp” phenomenon.]

Company Health Benefit Costs Do Not Equal Employees’ Healthcare Spending

The cost of providing health benefits for most larger companies includes not only the health benefits for employees, but also costs for retirees, and spouses and dependents of active workers.…

Doctors are Not Terrorists, But…….

July 23, 2012 / Michael D. Miller MD / Clinician-Patient Relationships, Delivery of Healthcare, Economics & Financing, Health System Reform, Information & Communications, Miscellaneous, Quality of Care & Safety / 1 Comment

Changing behavior is very complex. Many management books, philosophical tomes, and academic psychology articles have been written on this subject, so I’m going to simply and quickly get to the connections among doctors, terrorists, and health reform.

1. Changing people’s behavior requires appealing to basic motivating factors. Different individuals have different motivators, but everyone has them.

2. Physicians are a key part of the healthcare system. Improving quality and controlling healthcare spending will require physicians to do some things differently – particularly how they work with other clinicians (i.e., in teams), prescribe treatments, order tests, make referrals, and interact with patients and their families. …

Why Healthcare Spending is Slowing – A New Normal?

June 1, 2012 / Michael D. Miller MD / Clinician-Patient Relationships, Delivery of Healthcare, Economics & Financing, Federal Healthcare Reform, Health System Reform, Innovation, Medicare, Nutrition, Public Health / 3 Comments

The growth in healthcare spending has slowed in recent years. Many experts and pundits have sought to explain why – while also worrying, (or predicting), that this slowing is only temporary, i.e. past performance will predict the future.

Healthcare Delivery and Financing are Dynamically Evolving

The future will be significantly different than the past because our healthcare system, society, and economy are evolving into what might be called a “New Normal” state. Assuming current priorities and pressures continue, public and private sector organizations at all levels will increasingly emphasize value¹ in their decisions about spending and preferences for healthcare services – including choices about substituting one treatment option for another. …

Healthcare Turkey Talk

November 21, 2011 / Michael D. Miller MD / Clinician-Patient Relationships, Delivery of Healthcare, Federal Healthcare Reform, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Health System Reform, Quality of Care & Safety, State-Level Healthcare Reform / 3 Comments

Thanksgiving is a great occasion for learning what people think about the future of the US healthcare system.* This year, I’m going to find out what people are thinking about some of the coming health delivery system changes – particularly Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMH).

I’ve conducted this two-question informal survey with handfuls of people and found their level of knowledge and positive reactions equivalent to Congress’s approval rating, i.e. 9%. This is worrisome, since if transforming the US healthcare system to increase value and quality will be partially based on ACOs’ and PCMHs’ superior care coordinating abilities, it will be hard to improve cost, quality, and access at the local level if the average person/patient doesn’t know what these organization are, there is inherent aversion to their names, or there is resistant to unexplained “changes.”…

Patient-Centered Care? Or Not?

July 11, 2011 / Michael D. Miller MD / Access to Healthcare, Clinician-Patient Relationships, Delivery of Healthcare, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Health System Reform, Innovation, Politics, Public Health, Quality of Care & Safety / No Comments

The term “patient-centered care” has increasingly been used to describe healthcare structures that deliver better quality care – as well as often doing so with lower costs. And today there was a news story about how some medical schools are assessing applicants’ interpersonal skills, something that is fundamental for being a patient-centric clinician.

While there are have been numerous articles demonstrating the value of patient-centered care and concluding that it is better and should be promoted – including those looking at the ill named “Patient-Centered Medical Homes” – I’ve found myself pondering the following questions:

“What type of care have clinicians been providing if it hasn’t been patient-centered?…

Health Law Is Reforming System Via Market Forces

April 3, 2011 / Michael D. Miller MD / Federal Healthcare Reform, Health Policy and Communications Blog, Health System Reform, Innovation, Medicare, Politics, Private-Employer Based Health Insurance, Quality of Care & Safety / 4 Comments

All the controversial rhetoric about the new health reform law is missing a huge reality: The law is driving dramatic changes in the real world. Almost every major health delivery system is preparing to reorganize how they provide care to hundreds of millions of Americans by becoming Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).

Health Systems are Voting With Their Wallets
The magnitude and level of financial interest in ACOs – and proof that it is not just cautious planning – were dramatically illuminated by recent actions and a Washington Post article:

On Thursday, HHS released the long anticipated proposed rule for ACOs and Medicare “Shared Savings.”

…

1 2 3 ›»