After writing about Follow-On Biologics in a recent posting, I saw a notice about Health Canada’s proposal for how they would approve biologic products that are similar to already approved biologics whose patents have expired. They call these products Subsequent Entry Biologics (SEBs), and the proposal is open for public comment from March 14, 2008 until April 16, 2008.
While the draft guidance is lengthy, it does strike an overall well-balanced tone:
- “SEBs are not ‘generic biologics'”
- Approval of an SEB does not mean it can automatically be substituted for the original biologic that it is “similar” to
- Comparative studies will be required to generate data showing similarity to the original biologic in terms of quality, safety and efficacy
In many ways, the draft guidance is similar (no pun intended) to the process the US FDA used to approve some generic drugs prior to the 1984 Hatch-Waxman Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act.…